Bug#820516: [l10n] Updated Czech translation of refcard

[Miroslav Kure]

Package: refcard
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch

Hi,

in attachement there is updated Czech (cs.po) translation of refcard.
Please include it with the package.

Thank you

[victory]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:01:48 +0200

#: entries.dbk:13
msgid ""
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2016</year> <holder>Holger Wansing</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Your Name (\"Language\")</holder> </copyright>"

found now:
<year> should not be ...

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Post by victory
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:01:48 +0200

#: entries.dbk:13
msgid ""
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2016</year> <holder>Holger Wansing</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Your Name (\"Language\")</holder> </copyright>"

<year> should not be ...

Sorry, I don't get the point, what you want to say.
I see no syntax problem here.
???


Holger

[victory]

On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:10:09 +0200

Post by Holger Wansing

Post by victory

"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2016</year> <holder>Holger Wansing</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Your Name (\"Language\")</holder> </copyright>"

<year> should not be ...

Sorry, I don't get the point, what you want to say.
I see no syntax problem here.

as there is an explanation only for <holder> and not for <year>,
people don't think the field belongs to themselves
some examples below:

nb: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Hans Fredrik Nordhaug (Norsk bokmål)</holder> </copyright>"

hi: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>राजीव रंजन (\"हिन्दी\")</holder> </copyright>"

regardless of their work years, maybe almost all translations say the same years

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Post by victory
as there is an explanation only for <holder> and not for <year>,
people don't think the field belongs to themselves
nb: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Hans Fredrik Nordhaug (Norsk bokmål)</holder> </copyright>"
hi: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>राजीव रंजन (\"हिन्दी\")</holder> </copyright>"
regardless of their work years, maybe almost all translations say the same years

yes, I am adjusting the copyright hints for the actual commits and partly
for the past too (if translators miss that), to get that addressed.


Holger

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Post by Holger Wansing
Hi,

Post by victory
as there is an explanation only for <holder> and not for <year>,
people don't think the field belongs to themselves
nb: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>Hans Fredrik Nordhaug (Norsk bokmål)</holder> </copyright>"
hi: maybe 2008-
"<copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> <holder>W. Martin Borgert</"
"holder> </copyright> <copyright> <year>2004</year> <year>2010</year> "
"<holder>राजीव रंजन (\"हिन्दी\")</holder> </copyright>"
regardless of their work years, maybe almost all translations say the same years

yes, I am adjusting the copyright hints for the actual commits and partly
for the past too (if translators miss that), to get that addressed.

I have fixed this today for all translations (there were faults/inconsistencies
for all languages).


Holger

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

tags -1 + pending

Bug #820516 [refcard] [l10n] Updated Czech translation of refcard
Added tag(s) pending.

[Holger Wansing]

Control: tags -1 + pending

Post by Miroslav Kure
Package: refcard
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch
Hi,
in attachement there is updated Czech (cs.po) translation of refcard.
Please include it with the package.

cs.po has been committed, marking bug as pending.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2016 16:44:04 +0000
with message-id <E1bTtqO-0002Js-***@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#820516: fixed in refcard 9.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #820516,
regarding [l10n] Updated Czech translation of refcard
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ***@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)