odd emacs version in project-history

[황병희]

Hellow i'm Korean translator.

While i read the project hisoty, i found somewhat odd words which was
Emacs version [1] for Stretch release.

There is special Emacs version naming rule?

Sincerely, Byung-Hee

[1] "Emacs 4.88":
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/blob/master/project-history.en.dbk#L1435

[Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY]

Hello,

While i read the project history, i found somewhat odd words which was
Emacs version [1] for Stretch release.
There is special Emacs version naming rule?
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/blob/master/project-history.en.dbk#L1435

This version number 4.88 comes from Javier's commit
41a115fd66703a32e728f6cc3ddbc207dac5ac02.

This looks like a little mistake to me indeed; apparently in Stretch the
latest Emacs version available is 25.1.

I guess 25.1 is the correct version? I've just created this merge
request [2], can we merge it?

[2] https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/5

Thanks!

Best regards

--
Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
PGP 015AE9B25DCB0511D200A75DE5674DEA514C891D

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Hi
I think the mistake is in "Emacs", it should be Exim (Exim 4.88 was
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html

I have merged that MR. Thanks

Holger

Post by Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
Hello,

While i read the project history, i found somewhat odd words which was
Emacs version [1] for Stretch release.
There is special Emacs version naming rule?
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/blob/master/project-history.en.dbk#L1435

This version number 4.88 comes from Javier's commit
41a115fd66703a32e728f6cc3ddbc207dac5ac02.
This looks like a little mistake to me indeed; apparently in Stretch the
latest Emacs version available is 25.1.
I guess 25.1 is the correct version? I've just created this merge
request [2], can we merge it?
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/5
Thanks!
Best regards
--
Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
PGP 015AE9B25DCB0511D200A75DE5674DEA514C891D

--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

[Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY]

Hello,

I think the mistake is in "Emacs", it should be Exim (Exim 4.88 was
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html

Thanks, here is a merge request to add Exim 4.88:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/6

Thanks!

Best regards

--
Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
PGP 015AE9B25DCB0511D200A75DE5674DEA514C891D

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Post by Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
Hello,

I think the mistake is in "Emacs", it should be Exim (Exim 4.88 was
https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html

https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/6

IMO there's no strict need to add that, too.
I have already merged your first MR, so we have no incorrect
information in the manual anymore; that should be sufficient.

Holger

[Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY]

Post by Holger Wansing

Post by Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/project-history/-/merge_requests/6

IMO there's no strict need to add that, too.
I have already merged your first MR, so we have no incorrect
information in the manual anymore; that should be sufficient.

OK, withdrawn. Thanks!

--
Fabrice BAUZAC-STEHLY
PGP 015AE9B25DCB0511D200A75DE5674DEA514C891D