Discussion:
Bug#830719: Document the removal of upstart, suggest switch to supported init
(too old to reply)
Michael Biebl
2016-07-10 18:40:02 UTC
Permalink
Package: release-notes
Severity: normal

The upstart init system has been removed from unstable/testing, so it
looks like it won't be part of the upcoming stretch release.
I raised this issue on debian-devel [1] and one recommendation was, that
this fact should be mentioned in the release notes. We should suggest
that users switch to a supported alternative because post-stretch it's
likely that maintainers start removing native upstart jobs.

Regards,
Michael

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00025.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Baptiste Jammet
2016-08-10 21:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Control: tags -1 patch

Hi,
Post by Michael Biebl
The upstart init system has been removed from unstable/testing, so it
looks like it won't be part of the upcoming stretch release.
I raised this issue on debian-devel [1] and one recommendation was,
that this fact should be mentioned in the release notes. We should
suggest that users switch to a supported alternative because
post-stretch it's likely that maintainers start removing native
upstart jobs.
I write a section about it and I put it in the end of the Issues
chapter.
Please comment and correct.
(I could commit in some weeks if nobody disagree)

Baptiste
Niels Thykier
2016-08-11 06:30:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baptiste Jammet
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
Post by Michael Biebl
The upstart init system has been removed from unstable/testing, so it
looks like it won't be part of the upcoming stretch release.
I raised this issue on debian-devel [1] and one recommendation was,
that this fact should be mentioned in the release notes. We should
suggest that users switch to a supported alternative because
post-stretch it's likely that maintainers start removing native
upstart jobs.
I write a section about it and I put it in the end of the Issues
chapter.
Please comment and correct.
(I could commit in some weeks if nobody disagree)
Baptiste
Hi,

Thanks for the patch.

It looks good to me - though I would probably have done a:
s/You should also consider a switch/Please consider switching/

Feel free to commit with or without the change.

Thanks,
~Niels
Debian Bug Tracking System
2016-08-10 21:50:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Baptiste Jammet
tags -1 patch
Bug #830719 [release-notes] Document the removal of upstart, suggest switch to supported init
Added tag(s) patch.
--
830719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830719
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Debian Bug Tracking System
2016-08-28 16:10:02 UTC
Permalink
Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:04:45 +0200
with message-id <***@mailoo.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#830719: Document the removal of upstart, suggest switch to supported init
has caused the Debian Bug report #830719,
regarding Document the removal of upstart, suggest switch to supported init
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ***@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
830719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830719
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Loading...